The solution is n = –2 verified as a solution to the equation 1.4n + 2 = 2n + 3.2. What is the last line of the justification?

Which triangle congruence postulate or theorem justifies my claim that the steps i made using construction paper and scissors produce an isosceles triangle? was it sss, sas, asa, aas, or hl?

Prove (a) cosh2(x) − sinh2(x) = 1 and (b) 1 − tanh 2(x) = sech 2(x). solution (a) cosh2(x) − sinh2(x) = ex + e−x 2 2 − 2 = e2x + 2 + e−2x 4 − = 4 = . (b) we start with the identity proved in part (a): cosh2(x) − sinh2(x) = 1. if we divide both sides by cosh2(x), we get 1 − sinh2(x) cosh2(x) = 1 or 1 − tanh 2(x) = .

Will possibly give brainliest and a high rating. choose the linear inequality that describes the graph. the gray area represents the shaded region. 4x + y > 4 4x – y ≥ 4 4x + y < 4 4x + y ≥ 4