lets play a game if you follow the rules you win 100 points plus brainlist if u lose and brake rules we report you in this game first we are going to do try outs and equip 4 people only so be quick if you win the tryouts go to my profile and wait until i have the next question the first questiong for the tryouts is 5x6x5 first 4 to get it move on to the nxt part of the game

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Based upon past experience, barry expects no overdrafts. he expects no 2nd copies of statements. barry estimates that he will use network atms about 5 times a month with either bank. barry decides in the end to choose eecu. assuming that both banks provide the necessary services equally well, and based upon the tables of fees given above, how much can barry reasonably expect to save annually by choosing eecu in this case over e-town bank? a. $72 b. $78 c. $144 d. $24

Solve: 3x+y=6 4x-2y=18 show all work !