subject
Mathematics, 04.12.2020 20:50 lllmmmaaaooo

Jena is designing a frame for a client. She wants to prove to her client that m∠AGE ≅ m∠FHD in her sketch. What is the missing justification in the proof? Segment AB is parallel to segment CD, and transversal EF intersects segment AB at G and segment CD at H.

Statement Justification
segment AB is parallel to segment CD with transversal segment EF Given
m∠AGE ≅ m∠HGB Vertical Angles Theorem
m∠HGB ≅ m∠FHD
∠AGE ≅ ∠FHD Transitive Property

A. Alternate Exterior Angles Theorem
B. Corresponding Angles Theorem
C. Reflexive Property
D. Substitution Property

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:00
How is working backward similar to solving an equation?
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 21:00
How many kilograms of a 5% salt solution and how many kilograms of a 15% salt solution must be mixed together to make 45kg of an 8% salt solution?
Answers: 3
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 22:00
Need showing work for this problem 56.25 ×25.80
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 01:00
What are the solutions of the following system? y=-2x^2 y=x-2
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Jena is designing a frame for a client. She wants to prove to her client that m∠AGE ≅ m∠FHD in her s...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 03.05.2021 14:00
question
Physics, 03.05.2021 14:00
question
Mathematics, 03.05.2021 14:00
question
Spanish, 03.05.2021 14:00
question
History, 03.05.2021 14:00
question
Engineering, 03.05.2021 14:00
Questions on the website: 13722359