Answers: 2
Mathematics, 20.06.2019 18:04
Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:00
Solve this and show you’re work step by step ! -5 3/4+3h< 9 1/4 -
Answers: 1
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 20:00
Does anyone know how to solve and graph this: 4 + | a + 2 | < 7the only part i don't get is the "4 +"
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 20:30
Use complete sentences to differentiate between a regular tessellation, and a pure tessellation. be sure to include specific types of polygons in your explanation.
Answers: 2
5. Find the magnitude of 4i + 3j...
Mathematics, 12.05.2021 21:00
Mathematics, 12.05.2021 21:00
English, 12.05.2021 21:00
Physics, 12.05.2021 21:00
Mathematics, 12.05.2021 21:00
Mathematics, 12.05.2021 21:00
Mathematics, 12.05.2021 21:00
Social Studies, 12.05.2021 21:00
Physics, 12.05.2021 21:00