What can those engaged in politics from both parties learn about the Constitution from the debate over the Bill of Rights?

The Federalists wanted a strong government and strong executive branch, while the anti-Federalists wanted a weaker central government. The Federalists did not want a bill of rights —they thought the new constitution was sufficient. The anti-federalists demanded a bill of rights.

Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government. Anti-Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty.

answer: y=0 if that is what u r looking for

answer: i believe the answer is e

step-by-step explanation: