"It's not possible to map ABCD onto GFEH using a sequence of rigid transformations, so the quadrilaterals are not congruent." what error did Adam make in his conclusion?

A. One more transformation—a rotation— would map ABCD onto GFEH. So the quadrilateral are congruent.
B. One more transformation— a reflection— would map ABCD onto GFEH. So the quadrilaterals are congruent.
C. There is no error. This is a correct conclusion.

0.84 dang lotta people are looking for this lol or if you round up its 1 but the overall answer to that is 0.84

step-by-step explanation:

check above link.

graphically?   well, you graph them both, the solutions is where they both intersect each other, since there are two solutions, meaning they will meet twice, or namely the linear will run into the quadratic curve twice, and where they meet, those x,y coordinates are the solutions to the system.

the multiples of 15 are 15, 30,45, 60, 75, 90, 105, 120, 135, 150, 165, 180, 195,   210, 225, 240, 255, 270, 285, 300, 315, 330, 345, 360, 375,   390, 405, 420, 435, 450, 465, 480, 495, 510, 525, 540, 555, 570, 585, 600, 615, 630, 645, 660, 675, 690, 705, 720, and 735.

the factors of 15 are 1, 3, 5, and 15.

hope that , fam!

-une, your fren : )