Pls pls help I don’t have time HELP ASAP. It also detects if it’s right or wrong.

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Divide the following fractions 3/4 ÷ 2/3 1/2 8/9 9/8 2

Consider a bag that contains 220 coins of which 6 are rare indian pennies. for the given pair of events a and b, complete parts (a) and (b) below. a: when one of the 220 coins is randomly selected, it is one of the 6 indian pennies. b: when another one of the 220 coins is randomly selected (with replacement), it is also one of the 6 indian pennies. a. determine whether events a and b are independent or dependent. b. find p(a and b), the probability that events a and b both occur.