DO you people like dill pickles?

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Which three lengths could be the lengths of the sides of a triangle? 21 cm, 7 cm, 7 cm 9 cm, 15 cm, 22 cm 13 cm, 5 cm, 18 cm 8 cm, 23 cm, 11 cm

Solve the triangle. a = 21°, c = 105°, c = 5