This math problem (look at the screenshot) is for the smartest person in his/her class!

How is the number of vertices for a prism related to the name of the prism

What is the next step in the given proof? choose the most logical approach. a. statement: m 1 + m 2 + 2(m 3) = 180° reason: angle addition b. statement: m 1 + m 3 = m 2 + m 3 reason: transitive property of equality c. statement: m 1 = m 2 reason: subtraction property of equality d. statement: m 1 + m 2 = m 2 + m 3 reason: substitution property of equality e. statement: 2(m 1) = m 2 + m 3 reason: substitution property of equality

Manuela claims that and are congruent. which statement best describes her claim? she is incorrect because the segments do not have the same orientation. she is incorrect because the segments do not have the same length. she is correct because the segments have the same length. she is correct because the segments have the same orientation.