Jon uses his calculator to find one eleventh and he gets 0.090909091. He sees a repeating pattern. Then he uses it to find one thirteenth and he gets 0.076923077. He does not see a repeating pattern. Jon makes the following claim: Claim: If the decimal representation of a fraction in his calculator window shows the maximum number of places and does not show a repeating pattern, then the decimal representation is irrational. Is this true or false? Explain why this is true or give an example to show that it is false.

something that characterises a right triangle is the fact that we may use pythagoras' theorem to find any one of its sides given that we have the length of the other two sides. here, we have the length of the hypotenuse, √(87) yd, and one other side, √(23) yd, thus we can easily find the length of the remaining side using pythagoras' theorem as defined below:

c^2 = a^2 + b^2, where c is the length of the hypotenuse, and a and b are the lengths of the other two sides.

thus, given that c = √(87) and a = √(23), we may substitute these into the formula we defined above to get:

c^2 = a^2 + b^2

(√87)^2 = (√23)^2 + b^2 (substitute c = √87 and a = √23 into the equation)

87 = 23 + b^2 (evaluate (√87)^2 = 87 and (√23)^2 = 23 - remember that the square root of a number, squared will equal that very same number)

64 = b^2 (subtract 23 from both sides)

√64 = b (take the square root of both sides)

8 = b (evaluate √64 = 8)

therefor, the length of the unknown leg in the right triangle is 8 yd (first answer).

an altitude of 15,000 feet

step-by-step explanation:

triangle abc is reflected on the line x=-6.5 then reflected again on the x axis

step-by-step explanation:

60

step-by-step explanation: