Janet is designing a frame for a client. She wants to prove to her client that m ZAGE m2CHE in her sketch. What is the missing justification in the proof? Statement
Justification
ABCD with transversal EF Given
m ZAGE ZHGB
Vertical Angles Theorem
m ZHGB mZCHE
Alternate Interior Angles Theorem
m ZAGE m2CHE

The ksp expression for the system pbcl2(s) pb+2(aq) + 2 cl-(aq) is: [pbc12][pb+2][2cl-] [pb+2][cl-]2 [pb+2][2cl-]2 [pbcl2][pb+2][cl-]2 [pb+2][2cl-]2[pbcl2]

(01.02 lc) angle abc has point e on ray ba and point d on ray bc. points e and d are equidistant from point b. to bisect angle abc, which of the following needs to be identified for the construction? the distance between points e and d the point in the angle that is equidistant from points e and d the endpoint of rays ba and bc the point outside of the angle that is equidistant from points e and d

Evaluate this using ! 0.25^2 x 2.4 + 0.25 x 2.4^2 − 0.25 x 2.4 x 0.65