Please help this is due today! Use the diagram to complete the statements using correct notation. If there is not enough information to prove congruency, explain why:

Example cannot be determined

If it’s a congruent, the congruence reason has to be SAS SSS ASA OR SAA

Do not answer this with one answer ,blank, or a ridiculous answer. this is serious please.

Can not be determined.

Step-by-step explanation:

From the figure attached,

In ΔHFS and ΔIFS,

Side HS ≅ Side HI [Given]

∠HFS ≅ ∠IFS [Given]

Side FS ≅ Side FS [Reflexive property]

But there is no property of SSA (Side-side-angles for the congruence of two triangles)

Therefore, answer is "can not be determined".

the anwser is d) 75°

step-by-step explanation:

chiken

step-by-step explanation: