Y=20x .how much money she makes depends on how many lawns she mows. y =20 5 so then that would be 20 divided by 5 is 4. so the answer is y=4. Y is the dependent one and x is the independent Can you tell me why x is the independent and explain how you know please

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

What is the fewest number of full weeks briyana would have to work to have enough money? 8 weeks9 weeks 10 weeks11 weeks

What dimensions can créate more than one triangle ?