subject
Mathematics, 01.03.2021 04:00 Kurlyash

12. Arnold says that 2 = 4, and he uses the drawing in Figure 3.32 to support his conclu-
sion. What is wrong with Arnold's reasoning?
Do not just state the correct way to convert 23;
explain why Arnold's reasoning is not valid.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:30
Asurvey of 2,000 doctors showed that an average of 3 out of 5 doctors use brand x aspirin.how many doctors use brand x aspirin
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 21:00
A.s.a.! this is a similarity in right triangles. next (solve for x)a.) 12b.) 5c.) 12.5d.) [tex] 6\sqrt{3} [/tex]
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 22:00
To decrease an amount by 16% what single multiplier would you use
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 23:30
What is the ratio for the surface areas of the cones shown below, given that they are similar and that the ratio of their radii and altitudes is 2: 1? submit
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
12. Arnold says that 2 = 4, and he uses the drawing in Figure 3.32 to support his conclu-
sio...
Questions
question
Biology, 24.07.2019 03:30
Questions on the website: 13722362