The missing reason in the flow proof below is Linear pair postulate
Reflexive Property
Vertical Angle Theorem
Symmetric Property

If you prove that ∆wxz is congruent to ∆yzx, which general statement best describes what you have proved?

Pls yall i really need the answer fr fr

First work with stencil one. use a combination of reflections, rotations, and translations to see whether stencil one will overlap with the original pattern. list the sequence of rigid transformations you used in your attempt, noting the type of transformation, the direction, the coordinates, and the displacement