Look at the graph attached to this What is the approximate rate of change of this function on the interval [-2,2]?

A. 4

B. −9/8

C. 8/7

D. -7/2

(Please explain your answer)​​

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Ac contractor is building a new subdivision outside of the city. he has started work on the first street and is planning on the other streets to run in a direction parallel to the first. the second street will pass through (-2,4) find the equation of the location of the second street in standard form. a.2x+y=2 b. x-y=2 c.2x+y=2 d.x+y=2

You work for a lender that requires a 20% down payment and uses the standard depth to income ratio to determine a person‘s a little eligibility for a home loan of the following choose the person that you would rate the highest on their eligibility for a home loan