What is 3 x 3 in exponential form

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

One month, a music site observed that 60% of the people who downloaded songs from its site downloaded q sam's latest single. the equation below represents this information, where x represents the total number of people who ddownloaded songs from the site that month: x = 0.6x + 384 how many people who downloaded songs from the site that month downloaded q sam's latest single?

One line passes through (-7,-4) and (5,4) . another line passes through the point (-4,6) and (6,-9)