subject
Mathematics, 13.03.2021 04:20 deja163

A) chaim used an invalid reason to justify the congruence of a pair of sides or angles. B) chaim only established some of the necessary conditions for a congruence criterion.

C) chaim established all necessary conditions, but then used an inappropriate congruence criterion.

D) chaim used a criterion that does not guarantee congruence.

Plz help​


A) chaim used an invalid reason to justify the congruence of a pair of sides or angles.

B) chaim

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 23:30
What is the arc length of the subtending arc for an angle of 72 degrees on a circle of radius 4? o a. 8a oc. 16 t d. 8
Answers: 3
question
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 00:30
Examine this system of equations. what integer should the second equation be multiplied by so that when the two equations are added together, the x term is eliminated? 3/4x+1/7y=6 1/8x-3/5y=16
Answers: 3
question
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 03:00
Ratio of circumference to diameter example plz i need to now what it looks like.
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 03:30
What is the benefit of converting measures in a ratio to the same unit
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
A) chaim used an invalid reason to justify the congruence of a pair of sides or angles. B) chaim on...
Questions
question
Biology, 28.04.2021 19:30
question
Mathematics, 28.04.2021 19:30
question
Mathematics, 28.04.2021 19:30
question
Spanish, 28.04.2021 19:30
Questions on the website: 13722361