Please help i don’t understand

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Ineed no it anyone can see this

What is the probability of throwing several dice with sum equal to 6 (six)? show the ways of possibilities for sum 6 (as the numerator) and the ways of throwing n dices for n = 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 as denominator for all the questions to earn full credits. (a)throw one die, (b) throw two dice, (c) throw three dice (d) throw 4 dice, (e) throw 5 dice