Which argument explains why the measure of 3 is also 65​

add an image

step-by-step explanation:

kjgfcvbjkl

step-by-step explanation:

sdfghjkl; vbnm,

c.

step-by-step explanation:

substitution for (0,1)

y=x^2+4x+1

1=0^2+4(x)0+1

1=0+4(x)0+1

1=4(x)0+1

1=0+1

1=1

substitution for (-3,-2)

y=x+1

-2=-3+1

-2=-2

can you post the graph?