Which statement best demonstrates why the following is a non-example of a polynomial?

33 over 16xy − 62y−2xz − 35z2y2
(this are the exponent: -2, 2, 2)

a)the expression has a variable raised to a negative exponent.
b)the expression has a negative coefficient.
c)the expression has a variable raised to a fraction.
d)the expression has a variable in the denominator of a fraction.
i think the answer is a because an exponent cannot be a negative. however, i'm not sure if i'm correct. can someone me?

Option A- The expression has a variable raised to a negative exponent.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given : Expression -          

Yes Option A is correct i.e, The expression has a variable raised to a negative exponent.

Because the expression is written as  

→ Since the function which has variable in the denominator is not a polynomial because all exponent in a polynomial must be positive and when denominator goes to numerator the power became -1 which is negative.

Therefore, Option A is correct.

answer: your gay

step-by-step explanation:

you dont know math

i believe the correct answer is option 4.principalities were small territories that were run by russian rulers.

which statement correctly defines principalities in northern asia in the 1200s? principalities were small territories that were run by russian rulers.

hope i could ! : )