Ummm what this ?? Helping my sister
...
Answers: 1
Mathematics, 20.06.2019 18:04
Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:00
[10 points, algebra 2]according to my answer key the restrictions are -1 and 4. but why not positive 1?
Answers: 1
English, 01.09.2021 04:30
Arts, 01.09.2021 04:30
Mathematics, 01.09.2021 04:30
Mathematics, 01.09.2021 04:30
Chemistry, 01.09.2021 04:30
Chemistry, 01.09.2021 04:30
Mathematics, 01.09.2021 04:30
Mathematics, 01.09.2021 04:30
History, 01.09.2021 04:30
Mathematics, 01.09.2021 04:30
Mathematics, 01.09.2021 04:30
Mathematics, 01.09.2021 04:30
Chemistry, 01.09.2021 04:30
Mathematics, 01.09.2021 04:30
Mathematics, 01.09.2021 04:30