If a function uses variables other than x and y for its input and output variables, you take the original equation and solve for the input variable to find the inverse.

true
or
false
?

Step-by-step explanation:

When we talk about the input variable, it refers to the independent variable which most of the time is expressed as x. That means the output variable often refers to y, because that's the image or range.

So, in this case, if we want to find the inverse of a function, we just have to solve for x, that is, for the input variable. For example, if we have the following function

The input variable would be , so the inverse would be found by solving for that variable

However, we need to switch the position of variables to find the inverse function as follows

Therefore, to the inverse of a function we certainly have to solve for the input variable, but then we need to do an extra step, swtich variable's position, that's why this statement is false, because it doesn't express the full process.

a .4y4

hope this !

describing distributions is one of the key skills you’ll need to earn a high score on the ap statistics exam. if you need proof of this, just flip through some past exam questions, which can be found at the collegeboard website. you’ll notice that the first free response question is almost always a question requiring you to look at a graph and describe it.

step-by-step explanation: just trying to get points sorry : (