Me solve this by multiplication or linar combination

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Which sums are equal to 1hold 6/8? choose all answers that are correcta.1/8+6/8b.12/8+2/8c.8/8+1/8+1/8+1/8+1/8+1/8+1/8d.8/8+6/8

Askate shop rents roller skates as shown on the table below. which graph and function models this situation?