Nessa proved that these triangles are congruent using asa. roberto proved that they are congruent using aas. which statement and reason would be included in roberto’s proof that was not included in nessa’s proof?
given: b ≅ n; bc ≅ nm; c is right; m is right
prove: abc ≅ qnm
a ≅ q because of the third angle theorem.
ab ≅ qn because they are both opposite a right angle.
bc ≅ nm because it is given.
c ≅ m because right angles are congruent

im not sure

step-by-step explanation:

the total estimated nappy use.=10,500,000

step-by-step explanation:

given that on an average the average baby uses 3528 napkins.

in a particular year 2014, the number of births were 299697 in new south wales.

rounding off the number of births to the nearest hundred thousand we have

no of birtsh = 300000

also rounding off the average usage to nearst thousand we get

average use of a baby = 3500

hence total number of nappy estimated to be used = 3500x300000

= 10,500,000

answer is 10,500,000 nappies