(15 point question)
what is the missing justification in the proof of the angle bisector construction?

a. sss congruence
b. sas congruence
c. asa congruence
d. cpctc

D. CPCTC

Step-by-step explanation:

THere is a statement column proof given for angle bisector construction.

Statement                                  Justification

Angle MBP is congruent to       CPCTC

angle NBP

Since the previous line proved congruence for the two triangles by SSS,

the next step is corresponding angles are equal, by corresponding parts of congruent triangles are congruent

So we have the missing justification as CPCTC

D, CPCTC

5/20 so 25%

step-by-step explanation: