I will not deny that the defendant's action might seem heinous. nevertheless, such a competent jury cannot deny the dire circumstances of the defendant's upbringing! orphaned at birth, a loveless foster home, little encouragement in either schooling or vocation—who among us cannot understand the desperation that such circumstances might inspire? i submit that the defendant's crime would never have happened except for such desperate circumstances. you must acquit.

idk im srry

step-by-step explanation:

area = length x width

length = 2 x width

32 = 2 x width x width

32 = 2 x width^2

36 = width ^2  

width = 6

length = 12

area is 32

perimeter = 2 x 12 + 2 x 6 = 24 + 12 = 36

step-by-step explanation:

guess at question:

a vertical line intersects the graph of g(x,y) = 0 at two points. what conclusion follows about the function f(x) implicitly defined by g(x,f(x)) = 0?

the domain of f(x) cannot include the x coordinate of any such vertical line.

informally, f(x) is not a function, and

g(x,y)=0 cannot be solved for y uniquely.

the relation r = {(x,y) such that g(x,y) = 0} is a function if

for all (a,b) ∊ r and (c,d) ∊ r, a=c implies b=d.

step-by-step explanation: