subject
Mathematics, 17.05.2021 23:40 gigioschoch

Please help me with this ASAP!! I'll offer brainliest! And 30 points!! A randomized study compared two drugs that are designed to increase a child's human growth hormone level. It was found that over a 1-year period, those receiving Drug A increased their hormone level by a mean of 28 IU. Those receiving Drug B increased their hormone level by a mean of 15 IU (IU = International unit).
To determine whether the results are significant, the data are rerandomized and the difference of the means is shown in the dot plot.
What is the best conclusion to make based on the data?

A.)The difference of the means is significant because the rerandomizations show that it is outside the range of what likely happens by chance.
B.)The difference of the means is not significant because the rerandomizations show that it is outside the range of what likely happens by chance.
C.)The difference of the means is not significant because the rerandomizations show that it is within the range of what likely happens by chance.
D.)The difference of the means is significant because the rerandomizations show that it is within the range of what likely happens by chance.


Please help me with this ASAP!! I'll offer brainliest! And 30 points!!

 A randomized study compar

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 13:20
Hello i need some with trigonometric substitutions. [tex]\int\limits^a_b {x} \, dx[/tex]
Answers: 3
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 17:40
The weight of full–grown tomatoes at a farm is modeled by a normal distribution with a standard deviation of 18.4 grams. the 95 percent confidence interval for the mean weight of the tomatoes is calculated using a sample of 100 tomatoes. what is the margin of error (half the width of the confidence interval)?
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:10
Girardo is using the model below to solve the equation . girardo uses the following steps: step 1 add 4 negative x-tiles to both sides step 2 add 1 negative unit tile to both sides step 3 the solution is which step could be adjusted so that gerardo's final step results in a positive x-value? in step 1, he should have added 4 positive x-tiles to both sides. in step 1, he should have added 3 negative x-tiles to both sides. in step 2, he should have added 4 negative unit tiles to both sides. in step 2, he should have added 1 positive unit tile to both sides.
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 20:00
An investment decreases in value by 30% in the first year and decreases by 40% in the second year. what is the percent decrease in percentage in the investment after two years
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Please help me with this ASAP!! I'll offer brainliest! And 30 points!! A randomized study compared...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 23.06.2019 03:30
question
Mathematics, 23.06.2019 03:30
question
Mathematics, 23.06.2019 03:30
Questions on the website: 13722362