Researcher has developed an algorithm for analyzing documents. To test the performance he runs the algorithm on documents with lengths of 10 pages, 20 pages, and 30 pages. The run times were 0.1 seconds, 0.2 seconds, and 0.4 seconds. Would the algorithm be reasonable for analyzing a 300 page document? Explain.(1 point) No, the run time is growing exponentially. For a 300 page document, it would be unreasonably long.

Yes, the run time is growing exponentially. For a 300 page document, it would still only be a few minutes.

Yes, the run time is growing linearly. For a 300 page document, it would still only be a few minutes.

No, the run time is growing linearly. For a 300 page document, it would be unreasonably long.

problem:

f(x) = - 2/3x + 5; f(5/2)

substitute 5/2 in for x:

f(5/2) = -2/3(5/2) + 5

simplify the right side:

f(5/2) = -5/3 + 5

f(5/2) = 10/3

f(5/2) = 10/3

i hope this !

im not sure

step-by-step explanation:

the largest number of the four options is 1.8 x 10-2

you have it in scientific notation.

1.80 x 10-6   = 0.00000180

1.80 x 10-4   = 0.000180 (bigger, or "less small", than the former one)

so

1.8 x 10-2       = 0.0180. as you see. the "less small", or the biggest one of them all.

as you have negative exponent, it means you are dividing 1.8 by 100 (i.e. moving the dot towards left, two times).

if you had positive exponent for the scientific notation, power of tenths, you would be multiplying times 100 (moving the dot towards right) as below:

1.8 x (10)2 = 180

so. if you have negative exponent in scientific notation, move the dot toward left. if it is positive, toward right as many times the exponent tells you.