An arrow is shot upward, with an initial velocity of 95 meters per second, at an angle of 48° with respect to the horizontal. The arrow is shot from a helght of 5 meters above the ground.
The horizontal distance x from the starting point and the height y above the ground of the arrow t seconds after. It is shot
are given by the parametric equations below.
x=(vo cose)
y=-4.91? + (vo sin 6)e+h
Here vo is the initial velocity, 8 is the initial angle with respect to the horizontal, and h is the initial height.

After the seventh month of a 12-month loan: the numerator is: {(n + 11) + (n + 10) + (n + 9) + (n + 8) + (n + 7) + (n + 6) + (n + 5)} = , and the denominator is: {(n) + (n + 1) + + (n + 11)} = . therefore, the fraction is numerator/denominator (to the nearest tenth) = %

Given: hf || jk; hg ? jg prove: fhg ? kjg to prove that the triangles are congruent by asa, which statement and reason could be used as part of the proof? fgh ? kgj because vertical angles are congruent. jkg ? hfg because vertical angles are congruent. fhg ? jkg because right angles are congruent. hfg ? kjg because alternate interior angles are congruent.

1- is the product of two rational numbers irrational or rational? first, make a hypothesis by multiplying two rational numbers. then, use variables such as x=a/b and y=c/d and the closure property of integers to prove your hypothesis. 2- what do you think the product of a nonzero rational number and an irrational number is? is it rational or irrational? make use of variables, the closure property of integers, and possibly a proof by contradiction to prove your hypothesis. 3- why do we have to specify that the rational number must be nonzero when we determine what the product of a nonzero rational number and an irrational number is? if the rational number were 0, would it give us the same result we found in part b?