Answers: 3
Mathematics, 20.06.2019 18:04
Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 17:30
Use the net as an aid to compute the surface area of the triangular prism. a) 550 m2 b) 614 m2 c) 670 m2 d) 790 m2
Answers: 1
Which graph matches the equation y+3=2(x+3)?...
Mathematics, 30.10.2020 18:20
Mathematics, 30.10.2020 18:20
Mathematics, 30.10.2020 18:20
Mathematics, 30.10.2020 18:20
Mathematics, 30.10.2020 18:20
History, 30.10.2020 18:20
Mathematics, 30.10.2020 18:20
History, 30.10.2020 18:20
Mathematics, 30.10.2020 18:20