Madison is calculating the area of a composite figure. The figure is made up of a rectangle with a base of 5 and a height of 3 and a triangle with a base of 5 and a height of 2. She finds the area of the rectangle by multiplying 5 and 3 to get 15 square units. Then she finds the area of the triangle by multiplying 5 and 2, and then multiplying by 2 to get 20 square units. She adds the areas together to get 35 square units. Is Madison's answer correct? Why or why not?

your answer is the frist one

hop i

so firstly, we need to isolate the y variables to be able to solve these inequalities. firstly, add 0.5x on both sides of the first inequality and subtract 1.5x on both sides of the second inequality:

now since the slope is positive for the first inequality, this means that the line going upwards belongs to the first inequality, and the line going downwards belongs to the second inequality.

next, since y ≥ in the first inequality, this means that the shaded region will be above the first inequality's line, thus shading regions a and b.

next, since y ≤ in the second inequality, this means that the shaded region is going to be below this line, thus shading regions a and c.

since both lines shade region a, this means that region a is the solution.

step-by-step explanation:

mark brainliest!