A newsletter publisher believes that 30% of their readers own a Rolls Royce. A testing firm believes this is inaccurate and performs a test to dispute the publisher's claim. After performing a test at the 0.02 level of significance, the testing firm fails to reject the null hypothesis. What is the conclusion regarding the publisher's claim

The evidence is not sufficient at the 0.02 level of significance to reject the claim that the percentage is 30%.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's first state the null and alternative hypotheses for this research;

H0: p = 0.30

Ha: p ≠ 0.30

Now, since the bull hypothesis is the claim and he fails to reject the null hypothesis from the research, we will conclude that;

The evidence is not sufficient at the 0.02 level of significance to reject the claim that the percentage is 30%.

i need a picture

step-by-step explanation:

step-by-step explanation:

the options are kind of confusing. i can tell you what i see going on here when i look at the graph.

the class and exam medians are closely related, and it looks like the low outlier on the exam did pull the median lower. [tex][/tex]