B. Compare the similar triangle proof from question 3 with the inscribed square proof. How are they different? Which method was easier for you to understand?

(1 point)

i might be wrong but this is what i put

Step-by-step explanation:

In question 3 it was comparing three triangles where now it is using the triangles to find the area of a square instead of proving that they are the same.

2 and 1.

step-by-step explanation:

plug in each answer. 0 doesn't work, 1 does. so does 2. 4 doesn't:

0 = 1 is not true.

2 = 2 is true.

4 = 4 is true.

8 = 16 is not true.

hope this !