Mr. Fischer, a bilingual teacher, teaches a mathematics class composed of native English speakers and English language learners (ELLs). He has introduced a new topic with new vocabulary words in which he presented the vocabulary words with several examples. Which of the following strategies should Mr. Fischer use next to check each student's understanding of the vocabulary words?a. having students look up the definition online to see if it matches what Mr. Fischer told themb. having students copy down the definition for each word that Mr. Fischer wrote on the board in Englishc. placing students in groups so each student can explain the vocabulary terms to their peers in Englishd. having students write a definition for each term in their own words in their native language

D. having students write a definition for each term in their own words in their native language

Step-by-step explanation:

In Mr Fischer's mathematics class, we are presented with two categories of learners. Those that are native speakers of English and those who are learners of English.

Both categories of students would show their understanding best in this lesson if they were to write in their own native language.

The native english-speakers would have no issues writing in English, but those who are English learners would have problems communicating their understanding of the lesson in English. So it is best they give their definitions in their native language.

the results from a pre-test for students for the year 2000 and the year 2010 are illustrated in the box plot. what do these results tell us about how students performed on the 29 question pre-test for the two years?

if we compare only the lowest and highest scores between the two years, we might conclude that the students in 2010 did better than the students in 2010. this conclusion seems to follow since the lowest score of 8 in 2010 is greater in value than the lowest score of 6 in 2000. also, the highest score of 28 in 2010 is greater in value than the highest score of 27 in 2000.

but the box portion of the illustration gives us more detailed information. the middle bar in each box shows us that the median score of 20 in 2000 is greater in value than the median score of 17 in 2010. further, we note that the box and whiskers divide the illustration into four pieces. each of these four pieces represents the same portion of students. so, the upper half of the students in 2000 scored in the same score range as the upper one-fourth of the students in 2010, see the illustration at a score of 20.

by considering the upper one-fourth, upper half, and upper three-fourths instead of just the lowest and highest scores, we would conclude that the students as a whole did much better in 2000 than in 2010. we would conclude that as a whole the students in 2010 are less prepared than the students in 2000.

in this section, we discuss box-and-whisker plots and the five key values used in constructing a box-and-whisker plot. the key values are called a five-number summary, which consists of the minimum, first quartile, median, third quartile, and maximum.

step-by-step explanation:

b.-4 units

all you   do is count how many times you move