A manufacturer of nickel-hydrogen batteries randomly selects 100 nickel plates for test cells, cycles them a specified number of times, and determines that 11 of the plates have blistered. (a) Does this provide compelling evidence for concluding that more than 10% of all plates blister under such circumstances? State and test the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of .05. In reaching your conclusion, what type of error might you have committed?
(b) If it is really the case that 15% of all plates blister under these circumstances and a sample size 100 is used, how likely is it that the null hypothesis of part (a) will not be rejected by the 0.05 test? Answer this question for a sample size of 200.

im pretty sure it would be 5 am, hope that , and give brainliest and guys if this is right then press the button and give 5 stars

the equation is not included but the answer is (1.50, 2.00, 2.75)

step-by-step explanation:

the area of ​​the surface of the rectangular prism here is 250 cm2, which is the surface of the shading

step-by-step explanation:

third choice down

step-by-step explanation:

the first inequality is based on the number of adults and campers, and the second inequality is based on the cost of feeding both the adult and the camper.

we know that there is room for 525 people max.   it's ok to have less than 525, but it's not ok to have more than 525, so the inequality is less than or equal to.   the number combination of adults (x) and campers (y) cannot exceed this 525 max.   therefore:

x + y ≤ 525

now we talk about cost.   it costs $9 to feed one adult, so depending upon the number of adults you have (x) depends upon how much it will cost to feed that number of adults.   same with the campers, who cost $5 to feed.   the adults can be represented by 9x and the campers can be represented by 5y.   since the budget cannot exceed 1,200, the second inequality is:

9x + 5y ≤ 1200