subject
Mathematics, 03.09.2021 23:30 texas101st78

For each of the following, mark whether it is a possible confounder (a factor that mixes up the results, making it look like candy is to blame when it's not.), a causal (or causation) link which supports the argument that candy causes criminal behavior (ie, explains how candy leads to criminality ), or neither (an irrelevant factor, something that may cause people to become criminals but has nothing to do with eating candy). a. Violent Abuse-- Children who suffer violent abuse are more likely to become violent adults and commit violent crimes.
b. Impulsive Personality-- Kids who are highly impulsive and have trouble delaying gratification are more likely to eat candy every day as children and more likely to disobey laws as adults.
c. Gender- Boys are overwhelmingly more likely to commit violent crimes.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 16:30
Which of the following answers is 5/25 simplified? 1/5 5/5 2/5 1/25
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 22:00
18 16 11 45 33 11 33 14 18 11 what is the mode for this data set
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 01:00
You have just applied, and have been approved for a $58,000 mortgage. the rate quoted to you by the lender is 6.1% for a 30 year fixed mortgage. determine how much of your third month’s payment goes towards the principal. $56.65 $56.93 $57.22 $57.51
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 01:00
The answer is 7.2 how would you put this as money
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
For each of the following, mark whether it is a possible confounder (a factor that mixes up the resu...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 18.02.2021 18:00
question
Mathematics, 18.02.2021 18:00
question
Mathematics, 18.02.2021 18:00
question
Mathematics, 18.02.2021 18:00
question
Physics, 18.02.2021 18:00
Questions on the website: 13722359