Please help me out, if you can :)​

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

State whether weight is a function of height for the six students and explain. a. yes, height is a function of weight because two students weigh 165 pounds but have different heights. b. no, height is not a function of weight because two students weigh 165 pounds but have different heights. c. yes, weight is a function of height because for each value of height there is one corresponding value of weight. d. no, weight is not a function of height because there is not enough data to determine a function.

Analyze the graph of the cube root function shown on the right to determine the transformations of the parent function. then, determine the values of a, h, and k in the general equation.