Answers: 1
Mathematics, 20.06.2019 18:04
Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 20:00
Put the equation in slope intercept form by solving for y
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 22:30
I’m really confused and need your assist me with this question i’ve never been taught
Answers: 1
Twice c is equal to 44...
Social Studies, 27.06.2020 07:01
Computers and Technology, 27.06.2020 07:01