Alexa wants to use an indirect proof to prove that all rectangles are not squares. She first assumes that all rectangles are squares. Alexa then provides the following counterexample to disprove her assumption.
She concludes that all rectangles must not be squares.
Which statement best describes Alexa’s indirect proof?

answer: sine

step-by-step explanation:

we have the parent function given by,

1. the function is translated 5 units to the left.

so, we get,   becomes

2. the function is translated 5 units to the right.

so, we get,   becomes

3. the function is translated 5 units upwards.

so, we get,   becomes

4. the function is translated 5 units downwards.

so, we get,   becomes

5. the function is reflected across x-axis.

so, we get,   becomes

6. the function is reflected across y-axis.

so, we get,   becomes .

step-by-step explanation:

mark brainliest.

m=-16

step-by-step explanation: