Are the numbers relative prime?

24, 65, 161

no

Step-by-step explanation:

24 isnt a prime

65 is

161 isnt

They are relative prime numbers because they don't have common factor

Step-by-step explanation:

24=3raise to the power of 3×3

24 is not a prime,it a composite numbers

65=5×13

65 is not a prime,it a composite numbers

161=7×23

161 is not a prime,it a composite numbers

guess at question:

a vertical line intersects the graph of g(x,y) = 0 at two points. what conclusion follows about the function f(x) implicitly defined by g(x,f(x)) = 0?

the domain of f(x) cannot include the x coordinate of any such vertical line.

informally, f(x) is not a function, and

g(x,y)=0 cannot be solved for y uniquely.

the relation r = {(x,y) such that g(x,y) = 0} is a function if

for all (a,b) ∊ r and (c,d) ∊ r, a=c implies b=d.

step-by-step explanation:

75%

step-by-step explanation: