What is wrong with the following proof? Clearly we know that 1 does not equal 2. What rule of algebra did we break that makes this conclusion invalid? I've numbered the lines for you so you can refer to the line numbers in your explanation

The cross-sectional areas of a right triangular prism and a right cylinder are congruent. the right triangular prism has a height of 6 units, and the right cylinder has a height of 6 units. which conclusion can be made from the given information? the volume of the triangular prism is half the volume of the cylinder. the volume of the triangular prism is twice the volume of the cylinder. the volume of the triangular prism is equal to the volume of the cylinder. the volume of the triangular prism is not equal to the volume of the cylinder.