Help

Juliana says that she can use the patterns of equivalent ratios in the multiplication table below to write an infinite number of ratios that are equivalent to 6: 10. which statement explains whether juliana is correct? she is correct because she can multiply 6 and 10 by any number to form an equivalent ratio. she is correct because 6: 10 can be written as 1: 2 and there are an infinite number of ratios for 1: 2. she is not correct because the multiplication table does not include multiples of 10. she is not correct because 6: 10 is equivalent to 3: 5 and there are only 9 ratios in the multiplication table that are equivalent to 3: 5.

Which graph represents the function g(x) = |x + 4| + 2?

Which of the following disjunctions is true? 4 + 4 = 16 or 6 - 5 = 11 4 · 3 = 7 or 3 - 2 = 5 8 - 5 = 13 or 7 · 2 = 12 7 - 4 = 11 or 6 + 3 = 9