Parallel and perpendicular lines practice

1. Write an equation in slope-intercept form of the line that passes through the given point and is parallel to the graph of the given equation (2,-2);y=-x-2

A) y=-2x
B) y=2x
C) y=1/2x
D) y=-x

2. Write an equation in slope-intercept form of the line that passes through the given point and is parallel to the graph of the given equation (2,-1);y=-3/2x+6

A) y=-3/2x+1
B) y=-3/2x-1
C) y=-3/2x+2
D) y=-3/2x+4

3. Write an equation in slope-intercept form of the line that passes through the given point and is parallel to the graph of the given equation (4,2);x=-3

A) y=2
B) y=2x+4
C) y=4x
D) x=4

4. Write an equation in slope-intercept form of the line that passes through the given point and is parallel to the graph of the given equation (-2,3);y=1/2x-1

A) y=1/2x+1
B) y=-2x-1
C) y=1/2x-1
D) y=-1/2x-1

5. Write an equation in slope-intercept form of the line that passes through the given point and is parallel to the graph of the given equation (5,0);y+1=2(x-3)

A) y=-1/2x+5
B) y=2x-5
C) y=1/2x-2
D) y=-1/2x+5/2

m∠a is 90°

m∠b is 40°

answer: 3.26019516

step-by-step explanation:

i think it's eleven too, don't woosh me here, but according to the "experts" it's 2.

the proof starts from the peano postulates, which define the natural

numbers n. n is the smallest set satisfying these postulates:

  p1.   1 is in n.

  p2.   if x is in n, then its "successor" x' is in n.

  p3.   there is no x such that x' = 1.

  p4.   if x isn't 1, then there is a y in n such that y' = x.

  p5.   if s is a subset of n, 1 is in s, and the implication

      (x in s => x' in s) holds, then s = n.

then you have to define addition recursively:

  def: let a and b be in n. if b = 1, then define a + b = a'

      (using p1 and p2). if b isn't 1, then let c' = b, with c in n

      (using p4), and define a + b = (a + c)'.

then you have to define 2:

  def:   2 = 1'

2 is in n by p1, p2, and the definition of 2.

theorem:   1 + 1 = 2

proof: use the first part of the definition of + with a = b = 1.

      then 1 + 1 = 1' = 2   q.e.d.

note: there is an alternate formulation of the peano postulates which

replaces 1 with 0 in p1, p3, p4, and p5. then you have to change the

definition of addition to this:

  def: let a and b be in n. if b = 0, then define a + b = a.

      if b isn't 0, then let c' = b, with c in n, and define

      a + b = (a + c)'.

you also have to define 1 = 0', and 2 = 1'. then the proof of the

theorem above is a little different:

proof: use the second part of the definition of + first:

      1 + 1 = (1 + 0)'

      now use the first part of the definition of + on the sum in

      parentheses:   1 + 1 = (1)' = 1' = 2   q.e.d.

step-by-step explanation: