What is the answer? answer is not a

Juliana says that she can use the patterns of equivalent ratios in the multiplication table below to write an infinite number of ratios that are equivalent to 6: 10. which statement explains whether juliana is correct? she is correct because she can multiply 6 and 10 by any number to form an equivalent ratio. she is correct because 6: 10 can be written as 1: 2 and there are an infinite number of ratios for 1: 2. she is not correct because the multiplication table does not include multiples of 10. she is not correct because 6: 10 is equivalent to 3: 5 and there are only 9 ratios in the multiplication table that are equivalent to 3: 5.

Which shows one way to determine the factors of 4x3 + x2 – 8x – 2 by grouping?

(01.04 lc)multiply 1 over 6 multiplied by negative 1 over 2. negative 1 over 3 negative 1 over 12 1 over 12 1 over 3