Tom went to a park that is the shape of a square if he runs a total of 8 miles around the park how far would it have been if he ran diagonally across the park

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Is δ pmr similar to δ smn ? if so, which postulate or theorem proves these two triangles are similar?

Acommunity group sells 2,000 tickets for its raffle. the grand prize is a car. neil and 9 of his friends buy 10 tickets each. when the winning ticket number is announced, it is found to belong to neil's group. given this information, what is the probability that the ticket belongs to neil? a.1/5 b.1/10 c.1/200 d.1/4