The following is an incorrect flowchart proving that point l, lying on line lm which is a perpendicular bisector of segment jk , is equidistant from points j and k: segment jk intersects line lm at point n line lm is a perpendicular bisector of segment jk, given. two arrows are drawn from this statement to the following two stateme what is the error in this flowchart? jl and kl are equal in length, according to the definition of a midpoint. an arrow is missing between ∠lnk = 90° and ∠lnj = 90° and ∠lnk ≅ ∠lnj. an arrow is missing between the given statement and ∠lnk ≅ ∠lnj. triangles jnl and knl are congruent by the angle-angle side (aas) postulate.

The complete question  is attached in the file. the correct response for why the flow chart given is incorrect is - triangles jnl and knl are congruent by the angle-angle-side postulate.for two triangles to be congruent it should fulfil one of the following postulates1. side angle side (sas)2. side side side (sss)3. side angle side (sas)as lm is perpendicular bisector of segment jk, this means that lm cuts jk at point n  perpendicularly, forming 2 right angles and bisect means that it cuts jk exactly at the midpoint of jk.  therefore when lj and lk are joined forming two triangles, sides jn and nk are equal.  lets compare the 2 triangles  δjnl               δknljn           =       kn∠lnk       =       ∠lnj (as both angles are right angles due to ln being perpendicular to jk)ln           =         ln   (as ln is common to both triangles)since 2 sides are equal and angle between these 2 sides are also equal this follows the side angle side postulate.therefore angle angle side postulate given in the flowchart is incorrect. this postulate is incorrect as the order is important. although angle side angle is a correct postulate, when this is in a different order we cannot use it to prove congruency.other statements are not incorrect.

No i just don’t understand why i know you were not my friend but you know i know that you were my best bro

Aye bruh i don’t know this but someone else who smarter than us will answer this