If, triangle mno congruent triangle pqr which of the following can you not conclude as being true? a. ray mn congruent ray pr b. angle m congruent angle p c. ray no congruent ray qr d. angle n congruent angle q,

A. ray MN congruent ray PR Since the two triangles are congruent, you can assume that those elements in the same relative position are also congruent. So ray MN congruent to ray PQ ray NO congruent to ray QR ray MO congruent to ray PR angle M congruent to angle P angle N congruent to angle Q angle O congruent to angle R Now with the above 6 items, look at the available options and see what isn't in the above list and the statement "A. ray MN congruent ray PR" pops out as something that's not true, so that is the answer.

This is what i found “an explicit formula designates the nth term of the sequence, as an expression of n (where n = the term's location). it defines the sequence as a formula in terms of n. this example is an arithmetic sequence(the same number, 5, is added to each term to get to the next term).” i hope this you for what your looking for. can you plz mark me brainliest?