Counsel in a trial are arguing that a DNA analysis isn't proof that a particular person was at the scene of a crime. As a DNA analyst, you've identified a point that clearly
matches the DNA sample and the suspects DNA. What should your response as an
expert witness be?
Argue that the DNA, combined with other testimony makes the suspect likely to have been
there
Agree with the lawyer that one matching point is likely to be a coincidence
Argue that even one point of similarity in a DNA profile means the chances of a mistake are
one in a billion
Argue that the suspect is clearly guilty, and the DNA analysis is irrelevant

answer:

well the blood rushes to the vessles in your pp (lol) it also happen because u see somthin erotic or pleasing somtimes it happenes by accdent or by purberty or an dream (know an an wet dream)

explanation:

answer:

Possibly

Explanation:

Depends on which platform you are using for communication

the treatment of other conditions (e.g., cystic breast disease) and for other medical reasons. Mastectomy is most effective when the cancerous tumour is discovered at an early stage and the malignant cells are localized. In order to best ensure the removal of all cancerous tissue, however, a margin of tissue surrounding a tumour and, sometimes, other nearby structures are also removed. Thus, there are several types of mastectomy, the selection of procedure depending on the location and extent of the disease (determined by X ray, thermography, and other diagnostic techniques) and the nature of the cancerous cells (determined by biopsy).

Explanation:

^^