Do you think companies should be required to disclose ingredients in their chemicals if there are environmental concerns. explain why or why not. use at least three pieces of evidence. to further explain: based on the articles, we know that companies are not legally required to tell us what's in their products. do you think that is okay? do you think they should have to tell us what's in their products if it could be harmful to people or animals?

The company should say, because if we don't know we could end up killing everything due to pollution.

air exerts forces on falling objects near earth’s surface.

explanation:

the term 'free falls' refer to object that are falling towards the earth, in a situation in which gravity is the only force acting on the object.

for an object in free fall, the acceleration is constant (g, the gravitational acceleration), and so the velocity of the object constantly increases.

for objects near earth's surface, there is always another force acting on the object: the resistance due to the air. this force is opposed to the direction of fall of the object, and it is proportional to the velocity of the object, so as the object falls down, this force increases up to a point when it balances the force of gravity, and the object continues its motion at constant velocity (called terminal velocity). since in this case gravity is not the only force acting on the object, we are not in a situation of free fall.